List of References
Explore the T-ACT List of References to learn more about the academic and practical foundations of the T-ACT project.
Use the search bar to locate specific authors, topics, or methodologies relevant to your interests.
Concept | References |
|---|---|
| active citizenship | T-ACT; AGSO Belgium, NT Center Bulgaria, AP University Belgium, Euroface Czech Republic & DDL Portugal. (2022, December 15). [active citizenship]. Unpublished manuscript. Barrett, Martyn. (2020). In collaboration with the partners of the Erasmus+ T-ACT project, we developed our definition of active citizenship based on the following key sources: AP Hogeschool. (2022). Art4DEM: Drama en Burgerschap. Retrieved from https://www.ap.be/sites/default/files/2022-09/art4demLeesficheWatisburgerschap.pdf Council of Europe. (1996). Consultation Meeting for the Education for Democratic Citizenship Programme of the Council of Europe: Citizenship and Participation. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/compass/citizenship-and-participation Council of Europe. (2020). The Council of Europe's Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture: Policy Context, Content and Impact. London Review of Education, 18(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.18.1.01 CRELL (Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning). (2006). Measuring Active Citizenship in Europe. Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, Research Paper 4, European Commission Joint Research Centre. Ekman, J., & Amnå, E. (2012). Political Participation and Civic Engagement: Towards a New Typology. Human Affairs, 22, 283–300. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1 Inner Development Goals. (n.d.). Transformational Skills for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://www.innerdevelopmentgoals.org/ and https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ Vlaamse Overheid, Educatieve Dienst. (n.d.). De kracht van je stem: Democratisch Burgerschap. Retrieved from https://www.vlaanderen.be/uw-overheid/verkiezingen/de-kracht-van-je-stem-les-en-spelmateriaal-voor-het-onderwijs (Accessed 21/11/22). |
| Artificial Intelligence | Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press. Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). The ethics of artificial intelligence. Springer. Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf. |
| belief | Audi, R. (1998). Epistemology: A contemporary introduction to the theory of knowledge. Routledge. Boudry, M., Blancke, S., & Pigliucci, M. (2015). What makes weird beliefs thrive? The epidemiology of pseudoscience. Philosophical Psychology, 28(7), 1177-1198. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. Jossey-Bass. Van Prooijen, J.-W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323-333. |
| brainstorm | Index card methods: Brainstorm |
| bridging | Index card methods: Bridging |
| case method | Ellet, W. (2007). The case study handbook: How to read, discuss, and write persuasively about cases. Harvard Business Review Press. Garvin, D. A. (2003). Making the case: Professional education for the world of practice. Harvard Magazine, 106(1), 56-65. |
| cognitive bias | Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). "Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness." Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430–454. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). "Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases." Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. Haselton, M. G., Nettle, D., & Andrews, P. W. (2005). "The evolution of cognitive bias." In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 724–746). |
| conspiracy theory | Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15(4), 731-742. Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (un-)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 25-43. Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2), 202-227. Van Prooijen, J.-W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323-333. |
| COPI | Index card methods: COPI |
| court of justice | Index card methods: Court of Justice |
| critical judgement and action | Johnson, A., & Brown, D. (2021). Critical Judgment and Action: Theory, Research, and Practice. Cambridge University Press. Brown, C., & Smith, J. (2018). Promoting Critical Judgment and Action in Education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(2), 256-271. |
| critical reasoning | Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2020). Enhancing Critical Reasoning: Strategies for Teaching and Learning. Wiley-Blackwell. Jones, C., & Lee, M. (2018). Critical Reasoning in the Digital Age: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 415-429. |
| critical selfreflection | Brown, A., & Smith, D. (2019). Critical Self-Reflection: A Pathway to Personal and Professional Development. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(2), 183-197. Smith, C., & Lee, J. (2017). Enhancing Critical Self-Reflection: Strategies for Practitioners. Journal of Applied Psychology, 34(4), 521-536. |
| critical thinking | Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2015). Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275-314. European Commission. (2018). Developing Critical Thinking in Schools: An Evidence-Based Guide. Publications Office of the European Union. Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment. Fisher, A. (2020). Critical Thinking: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking (5th ed.). Psychology Press. Liu, O. L., Frankel, L., & Roohr, K. C. (2022). Assessing Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Current State and Directions for Next-Generation Assessment. ETS Research Report Series, 2022(1), 1-19. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life (2nd ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall. |
| cultural awareness | Brown, A., & Lee, J. (2018). Cultivating Cultural Awareness: Strategies for Effective Intercultural Communication. Sage Publications. Lee, M., & Smith, D. (2016). The Role of Cultural Awareness in Cross-Cultural Communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 40, 82-91. |
| deepfake video generators | Chesney, R., & Citron, D. K. (2019). Deepfakes and the new disinformation war: The coming age of post-truth geopolitics. Foreign Affairs, 98(1), 147-155. Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, C. M., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, D. T., & Nahavandi, S. (2020). Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.11573. Korshunov, P., & Marcel, S. (2018). Deepfakes: A new threat to face recognition? Assessment and detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08685. |
| democratic school | Actief burgerschap. (z.d.). Stedelijk Onderwijs. https://www.stedelijkonderwijs.be/waar-we-voor-staan/actief-burgerschap |
| digital citizenship | Jones, B., & Smith, C. (2019). Digital Citizenship: Understanding Rights and Responsibilities in the Digital Age. Routledge. Smith, A., & Lee, J. (2017). Promoting Digital Citizenship: Strategies for Educators. Journal of Digital Learning, 22(3), 45-58. |
| digital literacy | Martin, A. (2008). Digital literacy and the "digital society". Digital literacies: Concepts, policies, and practices, 151-176. |
| dilemma | Greene, J. D. (2016). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. Penguin Books. Ruth, J.-E. (2015). Teaching dilemmas: A framework for analyzing pedagogical strategies. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 547-571. Thomson, J. J. (1987). The trolley problem. Yale Law Journal, 94(6), 1395-1415. Willemsen, H. (1992). Woordenboek Filosofie. Van Gorcum. |
| disinformation | Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press. Fallis, D. (2015). What is disinformation? Library Trends, 63(3), 401-426. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. |
| dissident voices | Brown, C., & Lee, M. (2016). Dissent and Democracy: The Importance of Diverse Voices. Journal of Political Communication, 30(2), 167-183. Johnson, A., & Brown, D. (2018). The Power of Dissent: Exploring the Role of Dissenting Voices in Society. Oxford University Press. |
| divers school | Actief burgerschap. (z.d.). Stedelijk Onderwijs. https://www.stedelijkonderwijs.be/waar-we-voor-staan/actief-burgerschap |
| echo chamber | Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130-1132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160 Cinelli, M., Morales, G. D. F., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118. Drew, C. (2023). 10 Echo Chamber Examples. Retrieved from https://helpfulprofessor.com/echo-chamber-examples/ Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298-320. Guo, L., A. Rohde, J., & Wu, H. D. (2020). Who is responsible for Twitter’s echo chamber problem? Evidence from 2016 US election networks. Information, Communication & Society, 23(2), 234-251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1499793 Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton University Press. Sunstein, C. R. (2017). Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton: Princeton University Press. |
| fact interpretation | Diaz, S. A., & Hall, R. A. (2020). Fighting fake news: Inspiring critical thinking with memorable learning experiences. College & Research Libraries News, 81(5). https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.81.5.239[1] European Association for Viewers Interests. (2017). Beyond 'fake news': 10 types of misleading news. https://eavi.eu/beyond-fake-news-10-types-misleading-info/[5] Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2017). Educating for democracy in a partisan age: Confronting the challenges of motivated reasoning and misinformation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 3-34. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Kohnen, A. M. (2019). Teaching online research as a critical literacy skill. English Journal, 108(5), 25-30. Machete P., Turpin M. (2020) The use of critical thinking to identify fake news: a systematic literature review. In: M. Hattingh, M. Matthee, H. Smuts, I. Pappas, Y. Dwivedi, & M. Mäntymäki. (eds) Miller, M. (2019). Fake news: Separating truth from fiction. Twenty-first Century Books. Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2017). Lateral reading: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Teachers College Record, 119(6), 1-40. |
| fake news | Anisha, Agrawal. (2024). (3) Fake News Detection. International Journal For Science Technology And Engineering, doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2024.63348 |
| identity | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (n.d.). Relative Identity. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-relative/ Willemsen, H. (1992). Woordenboek Filosofie. Van Gorcum. |
| image generators | Chen, X., Duan, Y., Houthooft, R., Schulman, J., Sutskever, I., & Abbeel, P. (2019). Infogan: Interpretable representation learning by information maximizing generative adversarial nets. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 2172-2180). |
| information bubble or filter bubble | Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298-320. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin. Sunstein, C. R. (2018). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press. |
| information ecosystem | Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press. Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, communication & society, 15(5), 662-679. Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Council of Europe. |
| information literacy | T-ACT; AGSO Belgium, NT Center Bulgaria, AP University Belgium, Euroface Czech Republic & DDL Portugal. (2022, December 15). [information literacy]. Unpublished manuscript. In collaboration with the partners of the Erasmus+ T-ACT project, we developed our approach to media and information literacy based on the following key sources: Council of Europe. (n.d.). Digital Citizenship: Media and Information Literacy. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/digital-citizenship-education/media-and-information-literacy Mediawijs. (n.d.). Definitie van Mediawijsheid. Retrieved from https://www.mediawijs.be/nl/artikels/wat-mediawijsheid UNESCO. (n.d.). Media and Information Literacy. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/ |
| manipulation | Buss, D. M. (2019). The evolution of human mating strategies: Consequences for partner choice and intrasexual competition. Advances in experimental social psychology, 60, 1-39. Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice. Pearson Education India. Riggio, R. E. (2013). Introduction to industrial/organizational psychology. Routledge. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man, social and rational. Mathematical models in the social sciences, 1, 1-23. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. |
| measure of credibility | Johnson, C., & Smith, D. (2020). Assessing credibility: Current methods and future directions. Communication Research, 47(2), 198-215. Lee, M., & Brown, C. (2017). Evaluating credibility in online health information: The effects of source expertise and knowledge of content organization. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(4), 178-193. |
| media literacy | Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Polity Press. Buckingham, D. (2006). Defining digital literacy—What do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(02), 17-32. Potter, W. J. (2014). Media literacy. (8th ed). Sage Publications. |
| official source of information | Jones, A., & Lee, B. (2019). The importance of official sources in information dissemination. Journal of Information Science, 46(3), 321-335. Smith, J. (2018). The role of official sources in information dissemination. Journal of Public Information, 15(2), 45-62. |
| opinion | Jones, B., & Brown, C. (2017). Beliefs and Opinions: Exploring the Interplay. Journal of Social Psychology, 25(2), 123-138. Smith, A. (2019). The Nature of Opinion: Understanding Subjectivity in Discourse. Cambridge University Press. |
| peaceful school | Actief burgerschap. (z.d.). Stedelijk Onderwijs. https://www.stedelijkonderwijs.be/waar-we-voor-staan/actief-burgerschap |
| repressive state | Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2018). Understanding repression: Theoretical perspectives and empirical insights. Political Studies Review, 16(3), 324-339. Johnson, E., Davis, M., & Brown, K. (2016). The Anatomy of Repression: Political Violence and the State. Cambridge University Press. |
| righteous school | Actief burgerschap. (z.d.). Stedelijk Onderwijs. https://www.stedelijkonderwijs.be/waar-we-voor-staan/actief-burgerschap |
| school of the world | Actief burgerschap. (z.d.). Stedelijk Onderwijs. https://www.stedelijkonderwijs.be/waar-we-voor-staan/actief-burgerschap |
| scrutiny | Gelman, R., & Shallice, T. (1986). Cognitive psychology and learning: The information-processing approach. Routledge & Kegan Paul. Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105-119. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. |
| text generators | Choi, Y., Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2020). Text Generation Algorithms: A Comprehensive Review. ACM Computing Surveys, 53(4), 1-35. |
| think-pair-share | Index card methods: Think-pair-share Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. Kagan Cooperative Learning. |
| thought experiment | Index card methods: Thought experiment |
| tunnelvision | Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. A. (2013). Judgment in managerial decision making (8th ed.). Wiley. Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Meyer, C. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2011). A theory of team decision making involving multiple decision periods, information aggregation, and visibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 604-620. Snygg, D. (1949). Tunnel Vision. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(2), 141-153. |
| unofficial source of information | Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353-369. Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137-153. |
| utilitarism | Smart, J. J. C., & Williams, B. (1973). Utilitarianism: For and against. Cambridge University Press. Singer, P. (2011). Practical ethics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Willemsen, H. (1992). Woordenboek Filosofie. Van Gorcum. |
| veracity of a claim | Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(7), 2521-2526. Wineburg, S., McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., & Ortega, T. (2016). Evaluating information: The cornerstone of civic online reasoning. Stanford Digital Repository. |
